Heat Pumps

Virtually every household has at least one heat pump — a refrigerator. Heat pumps work by using electricity to run pumps which move a compressible fluid around a thermodynamic cycle between two reservoirs of heat, and effectively “pump” heat against its natural direction of flow, from cold to hot. This is what your fridge does. It takes heat from the inside of your fridge (cold) and dumps it into the air in your kitchen (hot). This is why the air behind your fridge is hot. Since heat energy cannot be destroyed, if you take it away from the inside of your fridge, it has to be dumped somewhere else.

What heat pumps used for home heating do is instead pull heat out from the ground, and dump it into your house. They typically pump four times more energy as heat than they use in electricity, making them 500% “efficient” (not technically correct, but for analysis we can use the term “efficient”). By contrast, regular electric heaters are 100% efficient. Natural gas furnaces are about 200% “efficient” in comparison, since natural gas can be converted to electricity at about 50% efficiency. So, as science geeks can see, heat pumps are way more efficient than the alternatives, and because of this, they are much cheaper to run. Their drawback is the higher cost of installation (you need to dig up your lawn and bury a bunch of heat exchange coils), which explains why they have been slow to catch on.

Another benefit of heat pumps is that they do not contribute to global warming, unless the electricity used to run them was produced with carbon intensive fuels. Heat pumps remove heat from the ground or water and increase the temperature of your house. On clear nights this heat is radiated away to outer space, so heat pumps actually COOL the planet! And if the electricity used to power the heat pump comes from a hydro dam on a river somewhere, then the energy taken out of the river water to generate electricity results in a lower water temperature which also cools the planet!

How significant could this technology be? Very. To put it into perspective, the entire downtown core of Vancouver could be heated with heat pumps, and amazingly all this would require is a few 1 meter diameter pipes sucking sea water out of English Bay. The water would be sucked out at 10 degrees C, the heat pulled out, and then returned to the ocean at 5 degrees C. This would supply 80% of the heating energy for downtown, with the remaining 20% coming from the electricity needed to run the heat pumps. The heat energy would be transferred through heat exchangers to glycol alcohol lines which then distribute to each building through the sewers.

Why don’t we do this? Well, we decided years ago to instead pursue natural gas to provide building heat. Unfortunately, we didn’t build our infrastructure to accommodate this kind of centralized heating system, and now we are all paying for it because we are locked into using an unsustainable fossil fuel which produces carbon dioxide. While it would not be practical to put in this extensive heating system after the fact, what we can do instead is install air-to-air heat pumps. These transfer heat from the outside air to the inside air (an air conditioner run in reverse). Because air does not carry as much heat as liquids or the ground, these are not as efficient. However, for moderate temperatures above freezing, they are reasonably efficient. These could be used for half the year in Vancouver, with its moderate climate. In summer they would work in reverse, cooling the buildings. In the cold snaps in winter we would still use natural gas. But installing these air to air heat pumps would dramatically reduce energy use, running costs, and carbon emissions. The only drawback is the higher cost of installing them along with natural gas furnaces. This is why new units are available that use both natural gas (for when it’s below freezing), and the heat pump for when it’s not.

For homeowners, it now makes no financial sense to install a natural gas furnace in new homes or retrofits. While heat pumps are more expensive initially, they pay for themselves in a few years due to their much lower operating costs. If homeowners wanted to, they could even get off the grid, from both natural gas and electricity. With a solar panel installation on their roof they could charge their old electric car batteries during the day to store the energy, then use this energy to run a heat pump to heat their house at night. This setup would have problems dealing with a week of rainy Vancouver weather in November (not enough solar energy to run your house), but it would work in summertime or sunny winter stretches, and it would work all year long in more sunny locations like California. For rainy Vancouver, some other source of supplemental energy would be required during rainy periods and fortunately, when it’s raining in Vancouver we have lots of hydro power. But the technology all exists; it is just a matter of mainstream adoption to ramp up mass production and therefore reduce costs and fuel further innovations and efficiencies.

The Wikipedia page describes heat pumps well.

6 responses

  1. pete

    3 notes:

    1. geothermal heating (or cooling) changes the temperature of the ground (or lake/river/sea) which it uses. If it’s a rural house, no noticeable effect. If it is an urban area, very noticeable effect, and the efficiency assumptions quickly become invalidated as the heat is sucked out of the heat resirvoir, and the temperature underground gets closer to the air temperature of the houses being heated. However, in places with a day/night cycle where cooled during day, heated at night, it could work out. Also, if the heat resirvoir is a liquid source (lake), there are environmental effects as water of a different temperature is recirculated back, and different creatures start to grow in it.

    2. waste heat ! the heat dumped out when an energy source is converted to electrical or mechanical work can be used for heating! so the propane-fired house heater is rather wasteful, and using electricity to heat your house is insanely wasteful, but (with a centralized infrastructure), you can use the waste heat from the propane electricity generation to heat your house without consuming any of the electricity….

    3. this is an example of how different energy sources are of different ‘quality’. low-temperature diffuse heat sources are the least useful, high-temperature sources are of a higher quality. electrical or mechanical is the best.

    November 10, 2011 at 7:52 am

    • Hi Pete, yes using electricity to heat homes isn’t very efficient when you can instead use that to drive a heat pump. In some places I have heard they pump summertime heat into the ground which can be used later in the year as a store of heat in the winter. And using the waste heat from electricity is a good use of otherwise unusable energy, called cogeneration, which is what New York City does and is why they have steamy storm drains on the streets as the steam they use to distribute the heat escapes.

      November 13, 2011 at 3:24 am

  2. Ron

    A pleasure to read these article Mark. Particularly enjoyed the info about Chevron holding the battery patents in your article on electric cars. The things we don’t know…

    November 21, 2011 at 4:02 pm

    • Thanks Ron. Yes, the more I learn, the more crazy the world seems.

      November 23, 2011 at 6:37 am

  3. richard

    You might want to read up on the Kalina cycle – roughly ten percent more energy recovered using an ammonia mixture.

    Japan will be a key focus area given the high feed in tariffs that are in excess of US$0.50 per Kilowatt hour for geothermal power generation.

    And ISTR reading a suggestion that old North Sea oil wells could be developed for geothermal generation.

    Depending on climate, the way we heat homes may change, hence district heating may not be viable, or people might go around wearing hats indoors like they used to. Houses are a lot more complicated than they appear, they are right on the bleeding edge of technology.

    August 18, 2013 at 8:00 pm

    • The guy I used to sit beside at work did a proposal for a Kalina cycle project but we didn’t get it.

      August 19, 2013 at 2:20 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s